The Clash with the World

To my contemporaries my significance depends on my trousers; it may be that to a later era my significance will also depend a little on my writings.
(Søren Kierkegaard)

The first of many cartoons of Kierkegaard made by cartoonist Klæstrup appeared in The Corsair January 9, 1846. It depicted Kierkegaard as a man with extremely thin legs and with one trouser-leg invariably shorter than the other.

The pseudonymous authorship caused a great sensation among the literati of the time in Copenhagen. In literary circles it was well-known who the author was, although Kierkegaard guarded his pseudonymity jealously until 1846. In the autumn of 1845, a few months before the publication of the Unscientific Postscript, the talented critic P. L. Møller wrote a review of the existing pseudonymous works. This gave rise to a quarrel, the so-called 'Corsair dispute', which in many ways left a deep mark on the last ten years of Kierkegaard's short life.

P. L. Møller's review contained much praise and admiration, particularly for Kierkegaard's description of the aesthctic stage. But the reviewer took a sceptical view of Kierkegaard as an ethical and religious personality and allowed himself some remarks of a somewhat impertinent, almost personal nature. P.L. Møller devoted his attentions mainly to Guilty? -- Not Guilty? He undoubtedly knew that this book was a poetical-realistic treatment of the story of Kierkegaard's own engagement. He writes of the chief male character, Quidam, that he has lost all that constitutes personality: sentiment, intelligence, will, decision, action, nervous and muscular strength. Everything has been sacrificed to sterile dialectics. And this Quidam has put the female character to such experimental torture that it is astonishing that she has not gone mad or drowned herself. Thus it says:
Goldschmidt took a particular delight in having Kierkegaard caricatured in various ludicrous situations. Here training his girl by riding on her back.

"If healthy human reason may be allowed to step in here, it might perhaps say in rude impulsiveness: If you wish to regard life as a dissecting-room and yourself as a corpse, very well, tear yourself apart as much as you like; so long as you do no harm to others the police will not come and disturb your activities. But to weave another person into one's spider's web, dissect her alive, or torture the soul out of her little by little in the name of experiment, that is not yet permissible, except in the case of insects, and is there not horror even in the thought of that, which is repulsive to healthy human nature?"

In fact P. L. Møller takes up a moral stand against Kierkegaard which must have been all the more irritating as P.L. Møller had a bad reputation for being a loose-living "aesthete" just in Kierkegaard's understanding of the word, and as a Don Juan. Kierkegaard immediately wrote a scornful article, full of remarks calculated to arouse suspicion about P. L. Møller, in the distinguished daily paper "The Fatherland". At the end of it he expresses the following de- sire: "If only I might soon appear in "The Corsair"! It is really hard for a poor author to be pointed out as the only figure in Danish literature who has not been abused in it." "The Corsair" was a small, but very widely circulated and disreputable weekly which was wont to satirize, often in a coarse manner, the prominent personalities of the time. It carried on "a regime of terror", as was said at the time, and people feared "to be in the Corsair". The magazine had been started in 1840 by a quite young, promising poet, Meir Goldschmidt, who still edited it. P.L. Møller was an occasional contributor. Young Goldschmidt was full of admiration for Kierkegaard and had on various occasions "immortalized" Victor Eremita in his paper. Kierkegaard must undoubtedly have thought that by his officially expressed wish to be abused in The Corsair he had placed Goldschmidt and P. L. Møller in an insoluble dilemma. What were they to do?

Kierkegaard mustering his rather disabled troops in the combat with the Corsair.

But Goldschmidt complied with the wish. From January 1846 "The Corsair" embarked on a stultification of Kierkegaard as an author and as a private individual. The short articles were often accompanied by malicious caricatures, and the persecution continued for a long period. The effect on Kierkegaard was overwhelming, as can be seen from his numerous statements in the Journals about Goldschmidt and his "vulgarity", which he also called "literary contemptibility". Since he was very young, Kierkegaard has been in the habit of spending much time strolling in the streets, and he was very fond of holding conversations with ordinary folk. He was generous to beggars. Now according to his own statement his relationship with "the man in the street" was altered. He became known about the city as "a half-crazy eccentric". Street boys yelled Either -- Or after him and prostitutes accosted the author of The Diary of a Seducer. It was an easy matter for "The Corsair"'s illustrator to caricature Kierkegaard's outward appearance. He was not only round-shouldered but sway-backed and crook-backed as well. His legs were remarkably thin and his gait strangely irregular. Now it became a torture for him to walk along the street. He gradually began to feel like "a martyr who was being ridiculed to death." No one came to his aid to fight against "The Corsair". "The more distinguished envy" held back.

Søren Kierkegaard speaking with P.L. Møller. Cartoon by Klæstrup.

Kierkegaard began to feel more and more isolated, and during the following years his relationship with Christianity grew more intensified. The severe form of Christianity which he had learnt as a child began to become more and more dominant. He had experienced the evil of the world per- sonally through "The Corsair" 's persecution. He begins to feel more and more of a martyr. His leitmotif becomes to an increasing degree to "understand himself in suffering". The Christian ideal is a dying to the world, to temporality. Even great national events such as the Danish-German war of 1848 -- 50 are indifferent to him. "I know only one danger, that of religiosity." The liberal constitution of 1849 is also indifferent to him. He was distinctively conservative in politics, full of irony towards the democratic principle of coming to the right choice by means of a majority of votes, of the ballot system.

 

 

 


Back To Menu      Next Page